2026 of $120 million and the Company’s estimated future losses, in each case as directed by Company management and as set forth in the Internal Data; and (b) adding to the foregoing results the Company’s estimated net cash of $285 million as of March 31, 2026, as set forth in the Internal Data. Centerview then divided the results of the foregoing calculations by the number of fully-diluted Shares outstanding (determined using the treasury stock method and taking into account (1) approximately 53.2 million Shares outstanding, (2) approximately 4.8 million outstanding options with a weighted average exercise price of $13.45, (3) approximately 3.8 million unvested restricted stock units, (4) approximately 1.6 million warrants with a weighted average exercise price of $0.001 and (5) outstanding in-the-money options, restricted stock units, warrants and the impact of approximately 8.6 million Shares issuable upon the conversion of convertible notes, if applicable, at the applicable value) as of April 24, 2026, as set forth in the Internal Data.
12.
| By adding the bold and underlined text to the second bullet on page 36 in the section captioned “Opinion of Centerview Partners LLC – Other Factors” as follows: |
• | Analyst Price Target Analysis. Centerview reviewed stock price targets for the Shares in nine publicly available Wall Street research analyst reports as of April 28, 2026, which indicated low and high price targets for the Shares ranging from $22.00 to $42.00 per Share. |
Item 8. Additional Information.
Item 8 of the Schedule 14D-9 is hereby amended and supplemented as follows:
1.
| By deleting the paragraph on page 42 in the section captioned “—Legal Proceedings” and replacing it with the following paragraphs: |
“In connection with the Offer and the Merger Agreement, as of June 1, 2026, two complaints have been filed in state court by purported stockholders of the Company. On May 18, 2026, a purported stockholder of the Company filed a complaint against the Company and each member of the Company Board in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York, captioned Williams v. KalVista Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., Index No. 652897/2026 (the “Williams Complaint”). On May 20, 2026, a second purported stockholder of the Company filed a complaint against the Company and each member of the Company Board in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York, captioned Kent v. KalVista Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., Index No. 652943/2026 (together with the Williams Complaint, the “Complaints”).
The Complaints assert, among other things, claims for negligent misrepresentation and concealment and negligence under New York common law against all defendants. The Complaints allege that this Schedule 14D-9 omitted certain purportedly material information. Among other relief, the Complaints seek (i) an injunction prohibiting consummation of the Transactions, (ii) rescission or actual and punitive damages if the Transactions are consummated, and (iii) an award of the plaintiffs’ fees and expenses, including reasonable attorneys’ and experts’ fees and expenses. The Company has also received certain demand letters from purported stockholders making allegations similar to those contained in the Complaints.
The Company believes the claims asserted in the Complaints and demand letters are without merit.
The outcome of the matters described above cannot be predicted with certainty. Additional demand letters may be received and additional lawsuits may be filed against the Company, the Company Board, Parent and/or Purchaser in connection with the Transactions, this Schedule 14D-9 and the Schedule TO. If additional similar demand letters are received or complaints are filed, absent new or different allegations that are material, the Company, Parent and/or Purchaser will not necessarily announce such additional demand letters or complaints.”
2.
| By adding a new paragraph at the end of the section captioned “—U.S. Antitrust” on page 42 as follows: |
“The waiting period applicable to the Offer under the HSR Act expired at 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on May 28, 2026.”
3.
| By adding a new paragraph at the end of the section captioned “—Antitrust and Foreign Direct Investment (“FDI”) Filings—Germany Antitrust” on page 43 as follows: |
“On May 27, 2026, the Transactions were deemed to not satisfy the prohibition criteria of the GWB following a communication by the FCO.”
4.
| By adding a new sentence at the end of the first paragraph under the section captioned “—Antitrust and Foreign Direct Investment (“FDI”) Filings—Italy FDI” on page 43 as follows: |
“On May 29, 2026, the Italian FDI Authority notified Parent that the Transactions do not fall within the scope of Italian Decree Law No. 21/2012.”